On Tue, 19 Mar 2013, Daniel Vetter wrote: > For reference below the updated commit message. > > Cheers, Daniel > > Author: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx> > Date: Tue Mar 19 09:56:57 2013 +0100 > > drm/i915: stop using GMBUS IRQs on Gen4 chips > > Commit 28c70f162 ("drm/i915: use the gmbus irq for waits") switched to > using GMBUS irqs instead of GPIO bit-banging for chipset generations 4 > and above. > > It turns out though that on many systems this leads to spurious interrupts > being generated, long after the register write to disable the IRQs has been > issued. > > Typically this results in the spurious interrupt source getting > disabled: > > [ 9.636345] irq 16: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) > [ 9.637915] Pid: 4157, comm: ifup Tainted: GF > 3.9.0-rc2-00341-g0863702 #422 > [ 9.639484] Call Trace: > [ 9.640731] <IRQ> [<ffffffff8109b40d>] __report_bad_irq+0x1d/0xc7 > [ 9.640731] [<ffffffff8109b7db>] note_interrupt+0x15b/0x1e8 > [ 9.640731] [<ffffffff810999f7>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x1bf/0x214 > [ 9.640731] [<ffffffff81099a88>] handle_irq_event+0x3c/0x5c > [ 9.640731] [<ffffffff8109c139>] handle_fasteoi_irq+0x7a/0xb0 > [ 9.640731] [<ffffffff8100400e>] handle_irq+0x1a/0x24 > [ 9.640731] [<ffffffff81003d17>] do_IRQ+0x48/0xaf > [ 9.640731] [<ffffffff8142f1ea>] common_interrupt+0x6a/0x6a > [ 9.640731] <EOI> [<ffffffff8142f952>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b > [ 9.640731] handlers: > [ 9.640731] [<ffffffffa000d771>] usb_hcd_irq [usbcore] > [ 9.640731] [<ffffffffa0306189>] yenta_interrupt [yenta_socket] > [ 9.640731] Disabling IRQ #16 > > The really curious thing is now that irq 16 is _not_ the interrupt for > the i915 driver when using MSI, but it _is_ the interrupt when not > using MSI. So by all indications it seems like gmbus is able to > generate a legacy (shared) interrupt in MSI mode on some > configurations. I've tried to reproduce this and the differentiating > thing seems to be that on unaffected systems no other device uses irq > 16 (which seems to be the non-MSI intel gfx interrupt on all gm45). That might be misleading. It's possible that the erroneous IRQs _are_ being issued but you're simply not aware of them. If the kernel thinks that no device is using IRQ 16 then it will leave that IRQ disabled. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html