Dear Arnd Bergmann, On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 09:18:56 +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > Also, FWIW, recall this related discussion and other possible DT > > binding: > > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg219992.html > > > > drivers/bus/orion-mbus.c feels like the right option, but when I > > looked at it, getting the DT binding, and full dynamicness setup > > seemed like it would be best done after non-DT support was purged, and > > that is somewhat contigent on getting the irqchip and timer stuff > > sorted (see my first attempt at that): > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1852011/ > > > > Guess it depends where you want to draw the line on cleanups before > > something can be accepted.. > > I guess as long as we agree on where we are headed with the > address translation, it's ok to just move the code now and > change the code later. I would like to be strict about the > include path stuff though. Ok, so I could move the existing address decoding code into say drivers/bus/orion-mbus.c. Would that be ok for you? Thanks, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
