On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:01:19AM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Jason Gunthorpe,
>
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:51:05 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> > > > I'm refering to your earlier question about what PCI IDs to use for
> > > > the SW emulated devices. If there is no need for the host bridge then
> > > > you only need 1 PCI ID (for the root port bridge) and you can probably
> > > > fairly safely re-use the one in the Marvell config space of the HW.
> > >
> > > Ah, ok, I see. But isn't a host bridge needed to bind all the
> > > PCI-to-PCI bridges under a single bus, in order to get the global
> > > resource assignment I was referring to?
> >
> > The PCI-E spec requires it, but AFAIK it doesn't actually *do*
> > anything on Linux, and Linux doesn't require it.
> >
> > I thought Thierry did this experiment and decided it wasn't necessary:
>
> Could you detail what would be visible PCI bus topology if I remove the
> emulated PCI host bridge? (And keeping one PCI-to-PCI bridge per PCIe
> interface) ?
So if this is what you have now...
-[0000:00]-+-00.0 <- Host bridge
+-10.0 <- Bridge
+-11.0 <- Bridge
+-12.0 <- Bridge
Then removing the config space at 00.0 (ie the host bridge) will give
you:
-[0000:00]-+-10.0 <- Bridge
+-11.0 <- Bridge
+-12.0 <- Bridge
The 'host bridge' isn't a bridge in the PCI-PCI sense, it is just a
normal device at bus 0, device 0, function 0.
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
