[+cc Rafael]
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
<khlebnikov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> __e1000_shutdown() calls pci_disable_device() at the end, thus __e1000_resume()
> should call pci_enable_device_mem() to keep enable counter in balance.
>
> Bug was introduced in commit 23606cf5d1192c2b17912cb2ef6e62f9b11de133
> ("e1000e / PCI / PM: Add basic runtime PM support (rev. 4)") in v2.6.35
>
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: e1000-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> index 2853c11..6bce796 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> @@ -5598,6 +5598,13 @@ static int __e1000_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> pci_restore_state(pdev);
> pci_save_state(pdev);
>
> + err = pci_enable_device_mem(pdev);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> + "Cannot re-enable PCI device after suspend.\n");
> + return err;
> + }
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Seems right to me, and the other users I looked at (igb, azx,
virtio_pci) call pci_disable_device() in .suspend() and call
pci_enable_device() in .resume() as you propose to do here.
I assume the e1000 folks will handle this patch (and the previous one).
> +
> e1000e_set_interrupt_capability(adapter);
> if (netif_running(netdev)) {
> err = e1000_request_irq(adapter);
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
