On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 10:39:25AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman >> <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 11:32:59PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: >> >> To use to control the delay attach driver for specific device. >> >> >> >> Will use bus notifier to toggle this bits when needed. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > Without a whole lot more context as to why you want this change, no, >> > sorry, I'll not accept it. >> >> Sorry, I should put you on the to list for the whole patchset. >> >> Those patches address Bjorn's request: >> 1. kill acpi_pci_root_start in drivers/acpi/pci_root.c >> 2. register pci device to device as soon as possible, so for_each_pci_device >> could be used early before pci_bus_add_devices. Just to be clear, I'm in favor of eliminating acpi_pci_root_start() eventually, but I didn't suggest this approach, and I don't like it much either. I don't have much constructive feedback yet, but this feels like a special case that's not cleanly integrated into the existing infrastructure. >> please check change log patch2-4. > > Sorry, I still don't see what is so special about PCI that they have to > do something different here. What am I missing? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
