On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 06:11:13PM +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 10:03:49AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 03:52:55PM +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > > The instance of Self, returned and created by Driver::probe() is
> > > dropped in the bus' remove() callback.
> > >
> > > Request implementers of the Driver trait to implement Send, since the
> > > remove() callback is not guaranteed to run from the same thread as
> > > probe().
> > >
> > > Fixes: 1bd8b6b2c5d3 ("rust: pci: add basic PCI device / driver abstractions")
> > > Reported-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Z9rDxOJ2V2bPjj5i@xxxxxxxxxx/
> > > Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > rust/kernel/pci.rs | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > As there's no in-kernel users of these, any objection for me to take
> > them for 6.15-rc1, or should they go now to Linus for 6.14-final?
>
> I think it's fine to take them for 6.15-rc1 only.
>
> --
>
> Note that, while those patches can be taken "as is" to stable trees, they
> require
>
> rust: platform: impl Send + Sync for platform::Device
> rust: pci: impl Send + Sync for pci::Device
>
> as well, if
>
> 7b948a2af6b5 ("rust: pci: fix unrestricted &mut pci::Device")
> 4d320e30ee04 ("rust: platform: fix unrestricted &mut platform::Device")
>
> are in the same tree.
Cool, I'll deal with that in a few weeks when -rc1 is out, thanks for
the warning.
greg k-h
