> On 05/03/2025 14:41, George Moussalem wrote: >> From: Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Not correct From. Cover letter should be written by you. Noted. I thought I'd keep the original author included and added my v3 changes which you rightfully pointed out should have been v4 instead. Will remove in next version. > >> This patch series adds the relevant phy and controller >> DT configurations for enabling PCI gen2 support >> on IPQ5018. IPQ5018 has two phys and two controllers, >> one dual-lane and one single-lane. >> >> Last patch series (v2) submitted dates back to August 27, 2024. >> As I've worked to add IPQ5018 platform support in OpenWrt, I'm >> continuing the efforts to add Linux kernel support. >> >> v3: >> *) Depends on: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/cover/20250220094251.230936-1-quic_varada@xxxxxxxxxxx/ > > Wasn't this applied, so why is it still a dependency? I explicitly added it as ipq5332 has not made it to the master branch yet. Should I remove? > > > >> *) Added 8 MSI SPI and 1 global interrupts (Thanks Mani for confirming) > Who did it? This v3 or other v3? Which v3 is this one here? As I mentioned, I overlooked the v3 submission and based this series as the next version of v2. Thanks for pointing it out. > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof Cheers, George
