On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 1:26 AM Alistair Popple <apopple@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I've asked a few times, but are there any plans/ideas on how to improve the > situation? I'm kind of suprised we're building things on top of a fairly broken > feature without an idea of how we might make that feature work. I'd love to > help, but being new to R4L no immediately useful ideas come to mind. It is not "broken" -- after all, it works as it was intended/designed when it was introduced, though it is definitely a hack and thus indeed the message could be improved greatly. :) As for how to improve it, e.g. Gary suggested the other day to use the DWARF information to locate the call site. I guess another way would be to generate different symbol names per call site, so that we can embed the path and line number into it (more or less), so that the user at least has a hint, though that may have disadvantages. Cheers, Miguel
