On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 07:36:19PM +0000, Borah, Chaitanya Kumar wrote: > Hello Bjorn, > > Hope you are doing well. I am Chaitanya from the linux graphics team in Intel. > > This mail is regarding a regression we are seeing in our CI runs[1] on linux-next repository. > > Since the version next-20250221 [2], we are seeing that some of the machines in our CI are unable to connect through ssh (and therefore unable to participate). > Looking at the logs we see this. > > ````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` > [ 5.838496] e1000e: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver > [ 5.838515] e1000e: Copyright(c) 1999 - 2015 Intel Corporation. > [ 5.838737] e1000e 0000:01:00.0: Disabling ASPM L1 > [ 5.840055] e1000e 0000:01:00.0: probe with driver e1000e failed with error -12 > ````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` > After bisecting the tree, the following patch [3] seems to be the first "bad" > commit > > ````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` > commit 7d90d8d2bb1bfff8b33acbb6f815cba6f5250fad > Author: Bjorn Helgaas mailto:bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx > Date: Fri Feb 14 18:03:00 2025 -0600 > > PCI: Avoid pointless capability searches > > Many of the save/restore functions in the pci_save_state() and > pci_restore_state() paths depend on both a PCI capability of the device and > a pci_cap_saved_state structure to hold the configuration data, and they > skip the operation if either is missing. > ````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` > > We verified that if we revert the patch the issue is not seen. Sorry about this; this patch was dropped in next-20250224 Bjorn
