On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 09:53:58AM -0600, Matthew Gerlach wrote:
> Add a device tree enabling PCIe Root Port support on an Agilex F-series
> Development Kit which has the P-tile variant of the PCIe IP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v7:
> - Create and use appropriate board compatibility and use of model.
>
> v6:
> - Fix SPDX header.
> - Make compatible property first.
> - Fix comment line wrapping.
> - Don't include .dts.
>
> v3:
> - Remove accepted patches from patch set.
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/Makefile | 1 +
> .../socfpga_agilex7f_socdk_pcie_root_port.dts | 147 ++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 148 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex7f_socdk_pcie_root_port.dts
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/Makefile
> index d39cfb723f5b..737e81c3c3f7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/Makefile
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_INTEL_SOCFPGA) += socfpga_agilex_n6000.dtb \
> socfpga_agilex_socdk.dtb \
> socfpga_agilex_socdk_nand.dtb \
> + socfpga_agilex7f_socdk_pcie_root_port.dtb \
> socfpga_agilex5_socdk.dtb \
> socfpga_n5x_socdk.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_KEEMBAY) += keembay-evm.dtb
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex7f_socdk_pcie_root_port.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex7f_socdk_pcie_root_port.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..19b14f88e32d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex7f_socdk_pcie_root_port.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Intel Corporation
> + */
> +#include "socfpga_agilex.dtsi"
> +#include "socfpga_agilex_pcie_root_port.dtsi"
> +
> +/ {
> + model = "SoCFPGA Agilex SoCDK";
> + compatible = "intel,socfpga-agilex7f-socdk-pcie-root-port", "intel,socfpga-agilex";
So that's different SoC (Agilex F series)? Why isn't this expressed in
compatibles? Is it different or the same board? If different, why
"root-port" in board name? Is this how the product is named?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
