Bowman, Terry wrote: > > > On 2/11/2025 8:00 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > > Terry Bowman wrote: > >> Add logic to map CXL PCIe Upstream Switch Port (USP) RAS registers. > >> > >> Introduce 'struct cxl_regs' member into 'struct cxl_port' to cache a > >> pointer to the CXL Upstream Port's mapped RAS registers. > >> > >> Also, introduce cxl_uport_init_ras_reporting() to perform the USP RAS > >> register mapping. This is similar to the existing > >> cxl_dport_init_ras_reporting() but for USP devices. > >> > >> The USP may have multiple downstream endpoints. Before mapping RAS > >> registers check if the registers are already mapped. > > Yes, now this sharing makes sense, but the ras_init_mutex + > > cxl_init_ep_ports_aer() approach to solving it is broken. > > > >> Introduce a mutex for synchronizing accesses to the cached RAS > >> mapping. > > In this case, especially for VH configs, you should just be able to map > > the RAS registers once from cxl_endpoint_port_probe(). That will > > naturally only be called once when the first endpoint arrives, and will > > never be torn down until the last cxl_detach_ep() event triggers > > delete_switch_port(). > There is still RPs and USPs that will be called for mapping more than once, > right? This will require synchronization, right? I feel like this would be a symptom of endpoint registration doing too much work. endpoint ports should only care about enabling RAS in their immediate upstream dport. So, what seems to be missing is upstream ports doing the same for their upstream dport.
