Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Remove global irq_type

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 05:30:42PM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 04:58:11PM +0900, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
> > The global variable "irq_type" preserves the current value of
> > ioctl(GET_IRQTYPE), however, it's enough to use test->irq_type.
> > Remove the variable, and replace with test->irq_type.
> 
> I think the commit message is missing the biggest point.
> 
> ioctl(SET_IRQTYPE) sets test->irq_type.
> PCITEST_WRITE/PCITEST_READ/PCITEST_COPY all use test->irq_type when
> writing the PCI_ENDPOINT_TEST_IRQ_TYPE register in test_reg_bar.
> 
> The endpoint function driver (pci-epf-test) will look at
> PCI_ENDPOINT_TEST_IRQ_TYPE register in test_reg_bar when determining
> which type of IRQ it should raise.
> 
> This means that the kernel module parameter is basically useless,
> since it is unused if anyone has called ioctl(SET_IRQTYPE).
> 
> Both the old pcitest.sh and the new pci_endpoint_test kselftest call
> ioctl(SET_IRQTYPE), so in practice the irq_type kernel module parameter
> is dead code.
> 

+1

> 
> > 
> > The ioctl(GET_IRQTYPE) returns an error if test->irq_type has
> > IRQ_TYPE_UNDEFINED.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Suggested-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c | 13 ++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> > index 6a0972e7674f..8d98cd18634d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> > @@ -100,10 +100,6 @@ static bool no_msi;
> >  module_param(no_msi, bool, 0444);
> >  MODULE_PARM_DESC(no_msi, "Disable MSI interrupt in pci_endpoint_test");
> 
> Considering that you are removing the irq_type kernel module parameter,
> it doesn't make sense to keep the no_msi kernel module parameter IMO.
> 
> The exact same argument for why we are removing irq_type, can be made for
> no_msi.
> 

Right.

- Mani

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux