On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 5:42 PM Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 01:10:19PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 7:14 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 02:50:29PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote: > > > > > > > > Ok, so the driver data is never set and runtime PM is never enabled for > > > > > > > this simple bus device, which uses pm_runtime_force_suspend() for system > > > > > > > sleep. > > > For now, the power.set_active propagation can be restricted to the > > parent of the device with DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND set that needs to be > > resumed and that will just be sufficient ATM, so attached is a patch > > doing this. > > I can confirm that this fixes the simple-pm-bus regression (without > reintroducing the pci warning) in case you want to get this to Linus > for rc2: > > Tested-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@xxxxxxxxxx> -rc2 may be a bit too close, and I think I should add a check for ignore_children to it, but yeah. I'll send a full patch shortly, thanks!
