On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 12:04:09PM +0530, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote: > Document the PCIe controller on IPQ5332 platform. IPQ5332 will > use IPQ9574 as the fall back compatible. > > Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v7: Moved ipq9574 related changes to a separate patch > Add 'global' interrupt > > v6: Commit message update only. Add info regarding the moving of > ipq9574 from 5 "reg" definition to 5 or 6 reg definition. > > v5: Re-arrange 5332 and 9574 compatibles to handle fallback usage in dts > > v4: * v3 reused ipq9574 bindings for ipq5332. Instead add one for ipq5332 > * DTS uses ipq9574 compatible as fallback. Hence move ipq9574 to be able > to use the 'reg' section for both ipq5332 and ipq9574. Else, dtbs_check > and dt_binding_check flag errors. > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml | 13 +++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml > index 413c6b76c26c..ead97286fd41 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml > @@ -34,6 +34,10 @@ properties: > - items: > - const: qcom,pcie-msm8998 > - const: qcom,pcie-msm8996 > + - items: > + - enum: > + - qcom,pcie-ipq5332 > + - const: qcom,pcie-ipq9574 Repeated many times on reviews to qcom: don't add to the end of the lists. In case of multiple items, these are ordered by fallback, so this goes next to other ipq entry... wait, that's already qcom,pcie-ipq9574, so why are you duplicating? On what tree are you working? Best regards, Krzysztof
