On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 11:45:43AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Sat, Dec 28, 2024 at 10:49:45AM -0800, Yury Norov wrote: > > Calling cpumask_next_wrap_old() with starting CPU == nr_cpu_ids > > is effectively the same as request to find first CPU, starting > > from a given one and wrapping around if needed. > > > > cpumask_next_wrap() is a proper replacement for that. > > > > Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx> > > s/switch/Switch/ in subject to match history. > > Since this depends on previous patches, I assume you'll merge them all > together, so: > > Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> Hi Bjorn, Thanks for review! Agree with everything you spotted out. I'll fix it in v2 if it will be needed, or inplace when applying. Thanks, Yury
