On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 10:00:20PM +0800, Zijun Hu wrote:
> From: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> pci_epf_add_vepf() will suffer -EBUSY error by steps below:
>
> pci_epf_add_vepf(@epf_pf, @epf_vf) // add
> pci_epf_remove_vepf(@epf_pf, @epf_vf) // remove
> pci_epf_add_vepf(@epf_pf, @epf_vf) // add again, -EBUSY error.
nit: can you align comments to the same column?
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx>
>
> Fix by clearing @epf_vf->epf_pf in pci_epf_remove_vepf().
>
> Fixes: 1cf362e907f3 ("PCI: endpoint: Add support to add virtual function in endpoint core")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c
> index 8fa2797d4169a9f21136bbf73daa818da6c4ac49..50bc2892a36c54aa82c819ac5a9c99e9155d92c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c
> @@ -202,6 +202,7 @@ void pci_epf_remove_vepf(struct pci_epf *epf_pf, struct pci_epf *epf_vf)
>
> mutex_lock(&epf_pf->lock);
> clear_bit(epf_vf->vfunc_no, &epf_pf->vfunction_num_map);
> + epf_vf->epf_pf = NULL;
> list_del(&epf_vf->list);
> mutex_unlock(&epf_pf->lock);
> }
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
