Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Fix the return value of IOCTL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 05:37:27PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 12/11/24 5:01 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> >  struct pci_test {
> > @@ -52,63 +51,65 @@ static int run_test(struct pci_test *test)
> >  		ret = ioctl(fd, PCITEST_BAR, test->barnum);
> >  		fprintf(stdout, "BAR%d:\t\t", test->barnum);
> >  		if (ret < 0)
> > -			fprintf(stdout, "TEST FAILED\n");
> > +			fprintf(stdout, "NOT OKAY\n");
> >  		else
> > -			fprintf(stdout, "%s\n", result[ret]);
> > +			fprintf(stdout, "OKAY\n");
> 
> Why not simplify as I suggested to avoid all these repetitive (and ugly) "if ()
> else" ?
> 

I've replied to your suggestion in v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20241211074757.byc5jqpgfe3otjh7@thinkpad/

Since the test is migrated to Kselftest right after this patch, I see no
incentive to simplify the code.

- Mani

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux