We've confirmed that peer-to-peer between these devices is
not possible. We can therefore claim that they support a
subset of ACS.
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <Joerg.Roedel@xxxxxxx>
---
Two things about this patch make me a little nervous. The
first is that I'd really like to have a pci_is_pcie() test
in pci_mf_no_p2p_acs_enabled(), but these devices don't
have a PCIe capability. That means that if there was a
topology where these devices sit on a legacy PCI bus,
we incorrectly return that we're ACS safe here. That leads
to my second problem, pciids seems to suggest that some of
these functions have been around for a while. Is it just
this package that's peer-to-peer safe, or is it safe to
assume that any previous assembly of these functions is
also p2p safe. Maybe we need to factor in device revs if
that uniquely identifies this package?
Looks like another useful device to potentially quirk
would be:
00:15.0 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI SB700/SB800/SB900 PCI to PCI bridge (PCIE port 0)
00:15.1 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI SB700/SB800/SB900 PCI to PCI bridge (PCIE port 1)
00:15.2 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI SB900 PCI to PCI bridge (PCIE port 2)
00:15.3 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI SB900 PCI to PCI bridge (PCIE port 3)
00:15.0 0604: 1002:43a0
00:15.1 0604: 1002:43a1
00:15.2 0604: 1002:43a2
00:15.3 0604: 1002:43a3
drivers/pci/quirks.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
index 4ebc865..2c84961 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
@@ -3271,11 +3271,40 @@ struct pci_dev *pci_get_dma_source(struct pci_dev *dev)
return pci_dev_get(dev);
}
+/*
+ * Multifunction devices that do not support peer-to-peer between
+ * functions can claim to support a subset of ACS. Such devices
+ * effectively enable request redirect (RR) and completion redirect (CR)
+ * since all transactions are redirected to the upstream root complex.
+ */
+static int pci_mf_no_p2p_acs_enabled(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 acs_flags)
+{
+ if (!dev->multifunction)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ /* Filter out flags not applicable to multifunction */
+ acs_flags &= (PCI_ACS_RR | PCI_ACS_CR | PCI_ACS_EC | PCI_ACS_DT);
+
+ return acs_flags & ~(PCI_ACS_RR | PCI_ACS_CR) ? 0 : 1;
+}
+
static const struct pci_dev_acs_enabled {
u16 vendor;
u16 device;
int (*acs_enabled)(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 acs_flags);
} pci_dev_acs_enabled[] = {
+ /*
+ * AMD/ATI multifunction southbridge devices. AMD has confirmed
+ * that peer-to-peer between these devices is not possible, so
+ * they do support a subset of ACS even though the capability is
+ * not exposed in config space.
+ */
+ { PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, 0x4385, pci_mf_no_p2p_acs_enabled },
+ { PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, 0x439c, pci_mf_no_p2p_acs_enabled },
+ { PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, 0x4383, pci_mf_no_p2p_acs_enabled },
+ { PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, 0x439d, pci_mf_no_p2p_acs_enabled },
+ { PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, 0x4384, pci_mf_no_p2p_acs_enabled },
+ { PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, 0x4399, pci_mf_no_p2p_acs_enabled },
{ 0 }
};
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
