Re: [PATCH v8 5/6] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Add doorbell test case

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 09:40:45AM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> Add three registers: PCIE_ENDPOINT_TEST_DB_BAR, PCIE_ENDPOINT_TEST_DB_ADDR,
> and PCIE_ENDPOINT_TEST_DB_DATA.
> 
> Trigger the doorbell by writing data from PCI_ENDPOINT_TEST_DB_DATA to the
> address provided by PCI_ENDPOINT_TEST_DB_OFFSET and wait for endpoint
> feedback.
> 
> Add two command to COMMAND_ENABLE_DOORBELL and COMMAND_DISABLE_DOORBELL
> to enable EP side's doorbell support and avoid compatible problem.

Can you explain the 'compatible problem' and how this patch avoids it? Just for
the sake of completeness.

> 
> 		Host side new driver	Host side old driver
> EP: new driver		S			F
> EP: old driver		F			F
> 
> S: If EP side support MSI, 'pcitest -B' return success.
>    If EP side doesn't support MSI, the same to 'F'.
> 
> F: 'pcitest -B' return failure, other case as usual.
> 
> Tested-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> Change form v6 to v8
> - none
> 
> Change from v5 to v6
> - %s/PCI_ENDPOINT_TEST_DB_ADDR/PCI_ENDPOINT_TEST_DB_OFFSET/g
> 
> Change from v4 to v5
> - remove unused varible
> - add irq_type at pci_endpoint_test_doorbell();
> 
> change from v3 to v4
> - Add COMMAND_ENABLE_DOORBELL and COMMAND_DISABLE_DOORBELL.
> - Remove new DID requirement.
> ---
>  drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/uapi/linux/pcitest.h     |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 72 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> index 3aaaf47fa4ee2..dc766055aa594 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,8 @@
>  #define COMMAND_READ				BIT(3)
>  #define COMMAND_WRITE				BIT(4)
>  #define COMMAND_COPY				BIT(5)
> +#define COMMAND_ENABLE_DOORBELL			BIT(6)
> +#define COMMAND_DISABLE_DOORBELL		BIT(7)
>  
>  #define PCI_ENDPOINT_TEST_STATUS		0x8
>  #define STATUS_READ_SUCCESS			BIT(0)
> @@ -53,6 +55,11 @@
>  #define STATUS_IRQ_RAISED			BIT(6)
>  #define STATUS_SRC_ADDR_INVALID			BIT(7)
>  #define STATUS_DST_ADDR_INVALID			BIT(8)
> +#define STATUS_DOORBELL_SUCCESS			BIT(9)
> +#define STATUS_DOORBELL_ENABLE_SUCCESS		BIT(10)
> +#define STATUS_DOORBELL_ENABLE_FAIL		BIT(11)
> +#define STATUS_DOORBELL_DISABLE_SUCCESS		BIT(12)
> +#define STATUS_DOORBELL_DISABLE_FAIL		BIT(13)
>  
>  #define PCI_ENDPOINT_TEST_LOWER_SRC_ADDR	0x0c
>  #define PCI_ENDPOINT_TEST_UPPER_SRC_ADDR	0x10
> @@ -67,6 +74,10 @@
>  #define PCI_ENDPOINT_TEST_IRQ_NUMBER		0x28
>  
>  #define PCI_ENDPOINT_TEST_FLAGS			0x2c
> +#define PCI_ENDPOINT_TEST_DB_BAR		0x30
> +#define PCI_ENDPOINT_TEST_DB_OFFSET		0x34
> +#define PCI_ENDPOINT_TEST_DB_DATA		0x38
> +
>  #define FLAG_USE_DMA				BIT(0)
>  
>  #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_TI_AM654			0xb00c
> @@ -108,6 +119,7 @@ enum pci_barno {
>  	BAR_3,
>  	BAR_4,
>  	BAR_5,
> +	NO_BAR = -1,

I really hate duplicating this enum definition both in EPF driver and here.
Maybe we should move this to pci.h?

>  };
>  
>  struct pci_endpoint_test {
> @@ -746,6 +758,62 @@ static bool pci_endpoint_test_set_irq(struct pci_endpoint_test *test,
>  	return false;
>  }
>  
> +static bool pci_endpoint_test_doorbell(struct pci_endpoint_test *test)
> +{
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev = test->pdev;
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	int irq_type = test->irq_type;
> +	enum pci_barno bar;
> +	u32 data, status;
> +	u32 addr;
> +
> +	if (irq_type < IRQ_TYPE_INTX || irq_type > IRQ_TYPE_MSIX) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Invalid IRQ type option\n");
> +		return false;
> +	}

Is this check necessary?

> +
> +	pci_endpoint_test_writel(test, PCI_ENDPOINT_TEST_IRQ_TYPE, irq_type);
> +	pci_endpoint_test_writel(test, PCI_ENDPOINT_TEST_IRQ_NUMBER, 1);
> +	pci_endpoint_test_writel(test, PCI_ENDPOINT_TEST_COMMAND,
> +				 COMMAND_ENABLE_DOORBELL);
> +
> +	wait_for_completion_timeout(&test->irq_raised, msecs_to_jiffies(1000));
> +
> +	status = pci_endpoint_test_readl(test, PCI_ENDPOINT_TEST_STATUS);
> +	if (status & STATUS_DOORBELL_ENABLE_FAIL)
> +		return false;

I think we should add a error print here and below.

> +
> +	data = pci_endpoint_test_readl(test, PCI_ENDPOINT_TEST_DB_DATA);
> +	addr = pci_endpoint_test_readl(test, PCI_ENDPOINT_TEST_DB_OFFSET);
> +	bar = pci_endpoint_test_readl(test, PCI_ENDPOINT_TEST_DB_BAR);
> +
> +	pci_endpoint_test_writel(test, PCI_ENDPOINT_TEST_IRQ_TYPE, irq_type);
> +	pci_endpoint_test_writel(test, PCI_ENDPOINT_TEST_IRQ_NUMBER, 1);
> +
> +	pci_endpoint_test_writel(test, PCI_ENDPOINT_TEST_STATUS, 0);
> +
> +	bar = pci_endpoint_test_readl(test, PCI_ENDPOINT_TEST_DB_BAR);
> +
> +	writel(data, test->bar[bar] + addr);
> +
> +	wait_for_completion_timeout(&test->irq_raised, msecs_to_jiffies(1000));
> +
> +	status = pci_endpoint_test_readl(test, PCI_ENDPOINT_TEST_STATUS);
> +
> +	pci_endpoint_test_writel(test, PCI_ENDPOINT_TEST_COMMAND,
> +				 COMMAND_DISABLE_DOORBELL);
> +
> +	wait_for_completion_timeout(&test->irq_raised, msecs_to_jiffies(1000));
> +
> +	status |= pci_endpoint_test_readl(test, PCI_ENDPOINT_TEST_STATUS);
> +
> +	if ((status & STATUS_DOORBELL_SUCCESS) &&
> +	    (status & STATUS_DOORBELL_DISABLE_SUCCESS))
> +		return true;

Usual convention is to check for error and return true at the end.

> +
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  static long pci_endpoint_test_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>  				    unsigned long arg)
>  {
> @@ -793,6 +861,9 @@ static long pci_endpoint_test_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>  	case PCITEST_CLEAR_IRQ:
>  		ret = pci_endpoint_test_clear_irq(test);
>  		break;
> +	case PCITEST_DOORBELL:
> +		ret = pci_endpoint_test_doorbell(test);
> +		break;
>  	}
>  
>  ret:
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/pcitest.h b/include/uapi/linux/pcitest.h
> index 94b46b043b536..06d9f548b510e 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/pcitest.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/pcitest.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>  #define PCITEST_SET_IRQTYPE	_IOW('P', 0x8, int)
>  #define PCITEST_GET_IRQTYPE	_IO('P', 0x9)
>  #define PCITEST_CLEAR_IRQ	_IO('P', 0x10)
> +#define PCITEST_DOORBELL	_IO('P', 0x11)

I think defining PCITEST_CLEAR_IRQ as 0x10 was a mistake. It should've been 0xa.
But since it is a uapi, we cannot change it. Atleast add new ones starting from
0xa.

Niklas's consecutive BAR patch adds a new ioctl for 0xa, but we can fix the
conflict later depending on which patch gets merged first.

- Mani

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux