Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] PCI: qcom: Add Qualcomm SA8255p based PCIe root complex functionality

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 02:13:41PM -0800, Mayank Rana wrote:
> On SA8255p ride platform, PCIe root complex is firmware managed as well
> configured into ECAM compliant mode. This change adds functionality to
> enable resource management (system resource as well PCIe controller and
> PHY configuration) through firmware, and enumerating ECAM compliant root
> complex.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mayank Rana <quic_mrana@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig     |   1 +
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
> index b6d6778b0698..0fe76bd39d69 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
> @@ -275,6 +275,7 @@ config PCIE_QCOM
>  	select PCIE_DW_HOST
>  	select CRC8
>  	select PCIE_QCOM_COMMON
> +	select PCI_HOST_COMMON
>  	help
>  	  Say Y here to enable PCIe controller support on Qualcomm SoCs. The
>  	  PCIe controller uses the DesignWare core plus Qualcomm-specific
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> index ef44a82be058..2cb74f902baf 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> @@ -21,7 +21,9 @@
>  #include <linux/limits.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_pci.h>
>  #include <linux/pci.h>
> +#include <linux/pci-ecam.h>
>  #include <linux/pm_opp.h>
>  #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> @@ -254,10 +256,12 @@ struct qcom_pcie_ops {
>    * @ops: qcom PCIe ops structure
>    * @override_no_snoop: Override NO_SNOOP attribute in TLP to enable cache
>    * snooping
> +  * @firmware_managed: Set if PCIe root complex is firmware managed

ecam_compliant?

>    */
>  struct qcom_pcie_cfg {
>  	const struct qcom_pcie_ops *ops;
>  	bool override_no_snoop;
> +	bool firmware_managed;
>  	bool no_l0s;
>  };
>  
> @@ -1415,6 +1419,10 @@ static const struct qcom_pcie_cfg cfg_sc8280xp = {
>  	.no_l0s = true,
>  };
>  
> +static const struct qcom_pcie_cfg cfg_fw_managed = {

cfg_ecam?

> +	.firmware_managed = true,
> +};
> +
>  static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_pcie_ops = {
>  	.link_up = qcom_pcie_link_up,
>  	.start_link = qcom_pcie_start_link,
> @@ -1566,6 +1574,51 @@ static irqreturn_t qcom_pcie_global_irq_thread(int irq, void *data)
>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }
>  
> +static void qcom_pci_free_msi(void *ptr)
> +{
> +	struct dw_pcie_rp *pp = (struct dw_pcie_rp *)ptr;
> +
> +	if (pp && pp->has_msi_ctrl)
> +		dw_pcie_free_msi(pp);
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_pcie_ecam_host_init(struct pci_config_window *cfg)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = cfg->parent;
> +	struct dw_pcie_rp *pp;
> +	struct dw_pcie *pci;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	pci = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pci), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!pci)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	pci->dev = dev;
> +	pp = &pci->pp;
> +	pci->dbi_base = cfg->win;
> +	pp->num_vectors = MSI_DEF_NUM_VECTORS;
> +
> +	ret = dw_pcie_msi_host_init(pp);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	pp->has_msi_ctrl = true;
> +	dw_pcie_msi_init(pp);
> +
> +	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, qcom_pci_free_msi, pp);

return devm_add_action_or_reset()...

> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/* ECAM ops */
> +const struct pci_ecam_ops pci_qcom_ecam_ops = {
> +	.init		= qcom_pcie_ecam_host_init,
> +	.pci_ops	= {
> +		.map_bus	= pci_ecam_map_bus,
> +		.read		= pci_generic_config_read,
> +		.write		= pci_generic_config_write,
> +	}
> +};
> +
>  static int qcom_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	const struct qcom_pcie_cfg *pcie_cfg;
> @@ -1580,11 +1633,52 @@ static int qcom_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	char *name;
>  
>  	pcie_cfg = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> -	if (!pcie_cfg || !pcie_cfg->ops) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "Invalid platform data\n");
> +	if (!pcie_cfg) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "No platform data\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!pcie_cfg->firmware_managed && !pcie_cfg->ops) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "No platform ops\n");
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> +	pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> +	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto err_pm_runtime_put;
> +
> +	if (pcie_cfg->firmware_managed) {
> +		struct pci_host_bridge *bridge;
> +		struct pci_config_window *cfg;
> +
> +		bridge = devm_pci_alloc_host_bridge(dev, 0);
> +		if (!bridge) {
> +			ret = -ENOMEM;
> +			goto err_pm_runtime_put;
> +		}
> +
> +		of_pci_check_probe_only();

You haven't defined the "linux,pci-probe-only" property in DT. So if everything
works fine, then you can leave this call.

> +		/* Parse and map our Configuration Space windows */
> +		cfg = gen_pci_init(dev, bridge, &pci_qcom_ecam_ops);
> +		if (IS_ERR(cfg)) {
> +			ret = PTR_ERR(cfg);
> +			goto err_pm_runtime_put;
> +		}
> +
> +		bridge->sysdata = cfg;
> +		bridge->ops = (struct pci_ops *)&pci_qcom_ecam_ops.pci_ops;
> +		bridge->msi_domain = true;
> +
> +		ret = pci_host_probe(bridge);

return pci_host_probe()...

> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "pci_host_probe() failed:%d\n", ret);
> +			goto err_pm_runtime_put;
> +		}
> +
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
>  	pcie = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pcie), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!pcie)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -1593,11 +1687,6 @@ static int qcom_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (!pci)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> -	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> -		goto err_pm_runtime_put;
> -
>  	pci->dev = dev;
>  	pci->ops = &dw_pcie_ops;
>  	pp = &pci->pp;
> @@ -1739,9 +1828,13 @@ static int qcom_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  static int qcom_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
>  {
> -	struct qcom_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	struct qcom_pcie *pcie;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
> +	if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,pcie-sa8255p"))
> +		return 0;

How about bailing out if dev_get_drvdata() returns NULL?

- Mani

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux