On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 06:48:23PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > It is fine, but as a bare minimum, I would expect some sort of response, > so I won't sit and wait for unknown date when this API will be acknowledged/NACKed. > > I would like to start to work on next step, e.g removing SG from RDMA, > and I need to know if this foundation is stable to do so. > > > > > No changs to dma-iommu.c are going to get merged without an explicit > > ACK from Robin, and while there is no 100% for the core dma-mapping > > code I will also not merge anything that hasn't been resolved with > > my most trusted reviewer first, not even code I wrote myself. > > And do you know what is not resolved here? I don't. > All technical questions/issues were handled. Let's just wait a little bit, we're all overworked can't instantly context switch.
