Hi,
On 11:14 Fri 08 Nov , Andrea della Porta wrote:
> Hi herve,
>
> On 11:09 Fri 08 Nov , Herve Codina wrote:
> > Hi Andrea,
> >
> > On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 10:42:56 +0100
> > Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > When populating "ranges" property for a PCI bridge or endpoint,
> > > of_pci_prop_ranges() incorrectly use the CPU bus address of the resource.
> > > In such PCI nodes, the window should instead be in PCI address space. Call
> > > pci_bus_address() on the resource in order to obtain the PCI bus
> > > address.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 407d1a51921e ("PCI: Create device tree node for bridge")
> > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@xxxxxxxx>
> > > Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Tested-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > This patch, originally preparatory for a bigger patchset (see [1]), has
> > > been splitted in a standalone one for better management and because it
> > > contains a bugfix which is probably of interest to stable branch.
> >
> > Nothing to say for the patch itself.
> >
> > Just here, you mentioned "see [1]" but you didn't provide the link.
> >
> > IMHO, this is not blocking for applying the patch but, just for other people
> > looking at this email in the mailing list, can you reply providing the link?
>
> Thanks for pointing that out, sorry about that. Here it is:
>
> [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/all/f6b445b764312fd8ab96745fe4e97fb22f91ae4c.1730123575.git.andrea.porta@xxxxxxxx/
Do I have to resubmit the patch with the referenced url fixed or is it
ok as it is?
Thanks,
Andrea
>
> Many thanks,
> Andrea
>
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Hervé
