On Sat, 02 Nov 2024 11:10:12 +0000,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 06:34:44PM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> > Some PCIe host bridges require special handling when enabling or disabling
> > PCIe Endpoints. For example, the i.MX95 platform has a lookup table to map
> > Requester IDs to StreamIDs, which are used by the SMMU and MSI controller
> > to identify the source of DMA accesses.
> >
> > Without this mapping, DMA accesses may target unintended memory, which
> > would corrupt memory or read the wrong data.
> >
> > Add a host bridge .enable_device() hook the imx6 driver can use to
> > configure the Requester ID to StreamID mapping. The hardware table isn't
> > big enough to map all possible Requester IDs, so this hook may fail if no
> > table space is available. In that case, return failure from
> > pci_enable_device().
> >
> > It might make more sense to make pci_set_master() decline to enable bus
> > mastering and return failure, but it currently doesn't have a way to return
> > failure.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Change from v2 to v3
> > - use Bjorn suggest's commit message.
> > - call disable_device() when error happen.
> >
> > Change from v1 to v2
> > - move enable(disable)device ops to pci_host_bridge
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/pci.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > include/linux/pci.h | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > index 7d85c04fbba2a..5e0cb9b6f4d4f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > @@ -2056,6 +2056,7 @@ int __weak pcibios_enable_device(struct pci_dev *dev, int bars)
> > static int do_pci_enable_device(struct pci_dev *dev, int bars)
> > {
> > int err;
> > + struct pci_host_bridge *host_bridge;
> > struct pci_dev *bridge;
> > u16 cmd;
> > u8 pin;
> > @@ -2068,9 +2069,16 @@ static int do_pci_enable_device(struct pci_dev *dev, int bars)
> > if (bridge)
> > pcie_aspm_powersave_config_link(bridge);
> >
> > + host_bridge = pci_find_host_bridge(dev->bus);
> > + if (host_bridge && host_bridge->enable_device) {
> > + err = host_bridge->enable_device(host_bridge, dev);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > + }
>
> How about wrapping the enable/disable part in a helper?
>
> int pci_host_bridge_enable_device(dev);
> void pci_host_bridge_disable_device(dev);
>
> The definition could be placed in drivers/pci/pci.h as an inline
> function.
What does it bring? I would see the point if there was another user.
But this is very much core infrastructure which doesn't lend itself to
duplication.
Unless you have something in mind?
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
