Re: [PATCH v2] PCI/pwrctl: pwrseq: abandon QCom WCN probe on pre-pwrseq device-trees

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 8:36 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 11:24:46AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Old device trees for some platforms already define wifi nodes for the WCN
> > family of chips since before power sequencing was added upstream.
> >
> > These nodes don't consume the regulator outputs from the PMU and if we
> > allow this driver to bind to one of such "incomplete" nodes, we'll see
> > a kernel log error about the infinite probe deferral.
> >
> > Let's extend the driver by adding a platform data struct matched against
> > the compatible. This struct will now contain the pwrseq target string as
> > well as a validation function called right after entering probe(). For
> > Qualcomm WCN models, we'll check the existence of the regulator supply
> > property that indicates the DT is already using power sequencing and
> > return -ENODEV if it's not there, indicating to the driver model that
> > the device should not be bound to the pwrctl driver.
> >
> > Fixes: 6140d185a43d ("PCI/pwrctl: Add a PCI power control driver for power sequenced devices")
> > Reported-by: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Zv565olMDDGHyYVt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Applied to pci/for-linus for v6.12, thanks.
>
> It would help me out to have a hint in the posting that this is
> intended for the current release, since by default everything is for
> the "next" release.
>

Noted.

Thanks,
Bartosz





[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux