Re: [PATCH] PCI: optimize proc sequential file read

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Guixin,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on pci/next]
[also build test WARNING on pci/for-linus linus/master v6.12-rc3 next-20241018]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Guixin-Liu/PCI-optimize-proc-sequential-file-read/20241018-135026
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pci/pci.git next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241018054728.116519-1-kanie%40linux.alibaba.com
patch subject: [PATCH] PCI: optimize proc sequential file read
config: x86_64-randconfig-122-20241019 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241020/202410201436.9i93qAYF-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241020/202410201436.9i93qAYF-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410201436.9i93qAYF-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/

sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> drivers/pci/proc.c:22:1: sparse: sparse: symbol 'pci_seq_tree' was not declared. Should it be static?

vim +/pci_seq_tree +22 drivers/pci/proc.c

    21	
  > 22	DEFINE_XARRAY_FLAGS(pci_seq_tree, 0);
    23	static unsigned long pci_max_idx;
    24	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux