On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 03:09:23PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Since adding the PCI power control code, we may end up with a race > between the pwrctl platform device rescanning the bus and the host > controller probe function. The latter needs to take the rescan lock when > adding devices or may crash. > > Reported-by: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> > Fixes: 4565d2652a37 ("PCI/pwrctl: Add PCI power control core code") > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/pci/probe.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c > index 4f68414c3086..f1615805f5b0 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c > @@ -3105,7 +3105,9 @@ int pci_host_probe(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge) > list_for_each_entry(child, &bus->children, node) > pcie_bus_configure_settings(child); > > + pci_lock_rescan_remove(); > pci_bus_add_devices(bus); > + pci_unlock_rescan_remove(); Seems like we do need locking here, but don't we need a more comprehensive change? There are many other callers of pci_bus_add_devices(), and most of them look similarly unprotected. > return 0; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_host_probe); > -- > 2.30.2 >