On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'm not opposed to something like this, if people think it's useful. > > This patch sets the node quite early, before we even look at the _PXM > information in pci_acpi_scan_root(). That means if the BIOS does > supply a _PXM method and the user gives this argument, the > user-supplied info is silently overwritten. To me it would make more > sense to handle an option like this *after* we look for _PXM info. > That way it could be used to compensate for both missing and incorrect > _PXM info. yes, we can only let user input and hostbridge touch that array. but i'd like to only handle missing _PXM case. If the BIOS provide wrong _PXM, that BIOS really should be fixed at first. Yinghai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
