On 27/08/2024 11:22, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 27.08.24 08:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 26/08/2024 21:25, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> On 26.08.24 20:53, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> On 26/08/2024 19:56, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>>> Only few of the K3 SoCs have an IOMMU and, thus, can isolate the system >>>>> against DMA-based attacks of external PCI devices. The AM65 is without >>>>> an IOMMU, but it comes with something close to it: the Peripheral >>>>> Virtualization Unit (PVU). >>>>> >>>>> The PVU was originally designed to establish static compartments via a >>>>> hypervisor, isolate those DMA-wise against each other and the host and >>>>> even allow remapping of guest-physical addresses. But it only provides >>>>> a static translation region, not page-granular mappings. Thus, it cannot >>>>> be handled transparently like an IOMMU. >>>> >>>> You keep developing on some old kernel. I noticed it on few patchsets >>>> last days. Please work on mainline. >>>> >>> >>> How did you come to this conclusion? This patch set was written for >>> mainline, just rebased and tested again over next-20240826 before >>> sending today. >> >> You send it to addresses you CANNOT get from mainline kernel. There is >> no way mainline kernel get_maintainers.pl produces them. >> > > That is likely due to that I didn't re-run the get_maintainers.pl for > all areas of changes but rather reused an address list from a slightly > older posting, sorry. > > IOW, your assumption is still not correct when it comes to code. Sure, I see results and I am guessing the reason. Keeping the list static is not the approach you should be using, as seen here. It does not make even sense, because then you need to keep several lists per different subsystems or you CC unrelated people (don't). Just use simple wrapper over git send email, b4 or patman. https://github.com/krzk/tools/blob/master/linux/.bash_aliases_linux#L91 Best regards, Krzysztof
