Re: [PATCH v6 05/13] PCI: brcmstb: Use bridge reset if available

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 3:39 PM Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> On 8/19/24 21:09, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 1:41 PM Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Jim,
> >>
> >> On 8/16/24 01:57, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> >>> The 7712 SOC has a bridge reset which can be described in the device tree.
> >>> Use it if present.  Otherwise, continue to use the legacy method to reset
> >>> the bridge.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
> >>>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@xxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> One problem though on RPi5 (bcm2712).
> >>
> >> With this series applied + my WIP patches for enablement of PCIe on
> >> bcm2712 when enable the pcie1 and pcie2 root ports in dts, I see kernel
> >> boot stuck on pcie2 enumeration and I have to add this [1] to make it
> >> work again.
> >>
> >> Some more info about resets used:
> >>
> >> pcie0 @ 100000:
> >>         resets = <&bcm_reset 5>, <&bcm_reset 42>, <&pcie_rescal>;
> >>         reset-names = "swinit", "bridge", "rescal";
> >>
> >> pcie1 @ 110000:
> >>         resets = <&bcm_reset 7>, <&bcm_reset 43>, <&pcie_rescal>;
> >>         reset-names = "swinit", "bridge", "rescal";
> >>
> >> pcie2 @ 120000:
> >>         resets = <&bcm_reset 9>, <&bcm_reset 44>, <&pcie_rescal>;
> >>         reset-names = "swinit", "bridge", "rescal";
> >>
> >>
> >> I changed "swinit" reset for pcie2 to <&bcm_reset 9> (it is 32 in
> >> downstream rpi kernel) because otherwise I'm unable to enumerate RP1
> >> south bridge at all.
> >>
> >> Any help will be appreciated.
> >
> > Hi Stan,
> > Let me look into this.  Why is one of the controllers turning off --
> > is it not populated with a device?
>
> Yes, I enabled pcie1 but no PCI endpoint devices attached on the
> expansion connector.

Hi Stan,

I looked at our similar STB chip that has a rescal controller and
multiple PCIe controllers and it doesn't have this problem.  Our 7712
doesn't  have this problem either, only because it only has one PCIe
controller.

However, using my 7712 and unbinding the device (invokes
brcm_pcie_remove()) shows me behavior similar to yours (2712).  What I
do is read the rescal registers after the unbind, and they will either
be dead or alive.  If I comment out the
"pcie->bridge_sw_init_set(pcie, 1);" call, the rescal is still dead
after unbind.  However if I comment out that AND the
"clk_disable_unprepare(pcie->clk);" call,  the rescal registers remain
alive after unbind.

Perhaps you don't see the dependence on the PCIe clocks if the 2712
does not give the PCIe node a clock property and instead keeps its
clocks on all of the time.  In that case I would think that your
solution would be fine.

Regards,
Jim Quinlan
Broadcom STB/CM



>
> >
> > As you probably know the 7712 only has access to PCIe1.  But we do
> > have another chip with two controllers and I will try to reproduce
> > your failure and get to the bottom of it.
>
> Thank you for the help.
>
> ~Stan
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jim Quinlan
> > Broadcom STB/CM
> >>
> >> ~Stan
> >>
> >> [1]
> >> https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/blob/rpi-6.11.y/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c#L1711

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux