On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 09:50:01AM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 09:49:21PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 12:20:48PM +0530, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> > > Since the configuration of Legacy Interrupts (INTx) is not supported, set
> > > the .map_irq and .swizzle_irq callbacks to NULL. This fixes the error:
> > > of_irq_parse_pci: failed with rc=-22
> > > due to the absence of Legacy Interrupts in the device-tree.
> > >
> >
> > Do you really need to set 'swizzle_irq' to NULL? pci_assign_irq() will bail out
> > if 'map_irq' is set to NULL.
> >
>
> Hold on. The errono of of_irq_parse_pci() is not -ENOENT. So the INTx interrupts
> are described in DT? Then why are they not supported?
No, the INTx interrupts are not described in the DT. It is the pcieport
driver that is attempting to setup INTx via "of_irq_parse_and_map_pci()"
which is the .map_irq callback. The sequence of execution leading to the
error is as follows:
pcie_port_probe_service()
pci_device_probe()
pci_assign_irq()
hbrg->map_irq
of_pciof_irq_parse_and_map_pci()
of_irq_parse_pci()
of_irq_parse_raw()
rc = -EINVAL
...
[DEBUG] OF: of_irq_parse_raw: ipar=/bus@100000/interrupt-controller@1800000, size=3
if (out_irq->args_count != intsize)
goto fail
return rc
The call to of_irq_parse_raw() results in the Interrupt-Parent for the
PCIe node in the device-tree being found via of_irq_find_parent(). The
Interrupt-Parent for the PCIe node for MSI happens to be GIC_ITS:
msi-map = <0x0 &gic_its 0x0 0x10000>;
and the parent of GIC_ITS is:
gic500: interrupt-controller@1800000
which has the following:
#interrupt-cells = <3>;
The "size=3" portion of the DEBUG print above corresponds to the
#interrupt-cells property above. Now, "out_irq->args_count" is set to 1
as __assumed__ by of_irq_parse_pci() and mentioned as a comment in that
function:
/*
* Ok, we don't, time to have fun. Let's start by building up an
* interrupt spec. we assume #interrupt-cells is 1, which is standard
* for PCI. If you do different, then don't use that routine.
*/
In of_irq_parse_pci(), since the PCIe-Port driver doesn't have a
device-tree node, the following doesn't apply:
dn = pci_device_to_OF_node(pdev);
and we skip to the __assumption__ above and proceed as explained in the
execution sequence above.
If the device-tree nodes for the INTx interrupts were present, the
"ipar" sequence to find the interrupt parent would be skipped and we
wouldn't end up with the -22 (-EINVAL) error code.
I hope this clarifies the relation between the -22 error code and the
missing device-tree nodes for INTx.
Regards,
Siddharth.
