Re: [PATCH V2 0/7] Add power domain and MSI functionality with PCIe host generic ECAM driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 16:31, Manivannan Sadhasivam
<manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 10:12:17AM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 06:58, Mayank Rana <quic_mrana@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/23/2024 7:13 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 11:13:28AM GMT, Mayank Rana wrote:
> > > >> Based on previously received feedback, this patch series adds functionalities
> > > >> with existing PCIe host generic ECAM driver (pci-host-generic.c) to get PCIe
> > > >> host root complex functionality on Qualcomm SA8775P auto platform.
> > > >>
> > > >> Previously sent RFC patchset to have separate Qualcomm PCIe ECAM platform driver:
> > > >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/d10199df-5fb3-407b-b404-a0a4d067341f@xxxxxxxxxxx/T/
> > > >>
> > > >> 1. Interface to allow requesting firmware to manage system resources and performing
> > > >> PCIe Link up (devicetree binding in terms of power domain and runtime PM APIs is used in driver)
> > > >> 2. Performing D3 cold with system suspend and D0 with system resume (usage of GenPD
> > > >> framework based power domain controls these operations)
> > > >> 3. SA8775P is using Synopsys Designware PCIe controller which supports MSI controller.
> > > >> This MSI functionality is used with PCIe host generic driver after splitting existing MSI
> > > >> functionality from pcie-designware-host.c file into pcie-designware-msi.c file.
> > > >
> > > > Please excuse me my ignorance if this is described somewhere. Why are
> > > > you using DWC-specific MSI handling instead of using GIC ITS?
> > > Due to usage of GIC v3 on SA8775p with Gunyah hypervisor, we have
> > > limitation of not supporting GIC ITS
> > > functionality. We considered other approach as usage of free SPIs (not
> > > available, limitation in terms of mismatch between number of SPIs
> > > available with physical GIC vs hypervisor) and extended SPIs (not
> > > supported with GIC hardware). Hence we just left with DWC-specific MSI
> > > controller here for MSI functionality.
> >
> > ... or extend Gunyah to support GIC ITS. I'd say it is a significant
> > deficiency if one can not use GIC ITS on Gunyah platforms.
> >
>
> It if were possible, Qcom would've went with that. Unfortunately, it is not.

Ack.
Mayank, if the patch gets resent for any reason, please add this to
the commit message.

>
> - Mani
>
> --
> மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்



-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry





[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux