From: Keith Busch <kbusch@xxxxxxxxxx> The original implementation purposefully chose a non-recursive walk, presumably as a precaution on stack use. We do recursive bus walking in other places though. For example: pci_bus_resettable pci_stop_bus_device pci_remove_bus_device pci_bus_allocate_dev_resources So, recursive pci bus walking is well tested and safe, and the implementation is easier to follow. The motivation for changing it now is to make it easier to introduce finer grain locking in the future. Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/pci/bus.c | 34 ++++++++++------------------------ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/bus.c b/drivers/pci/bus.c index 7c07a141e8772..b7208e644c79f 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/bus.c +++ b/drivers/pci/bus.c @@ -389,37 +389,23 @@ void pci_bus_add_devices(const struct pci_bus *bus) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_bus_add_devices); -static void __pci_walk_bus(struct pci_bus *top, int (*cb)(struct pci_dev *, void *), +static int __pci_walk_bus(struct pci_bus *top, int (*cb)(struct pci_dev *, void *), void *userdata) { struct pci_dev *dev; - struct pci_bus *bus; - struct list_head *next; - int retval; + int ret = 0; - bus = top; - next = top->devices.next; - for (;;) { - if (next == &bus->devices) { - /* end of this bus, go up or finish */ - if (bus == top) + list_for_each_entry(dev, &top->devices, bus_list) { + ret = cb(dev, userdata); + if (ret) + break; + if (dev->subordinate) { + ret = __pci_walk_bus(dev->subordinate, cb, userdata); + if (ret) break; - next = bus->self->bus_list.next; - bus = bus->self->bus; - continue; } - dev = list_entry(next, struct pci_dev, bus_list); - if (dev->subordinate) { - /* this is a pci-pci bridge, do its devices next */ - next = dev->subordinate->devices.next; - bus = dev->subordinate; - } else - next = dev->bus_list.next; - - retval = cb(dev, userdata); - if (retval) - break; } + return ret; } /** -- 2.43.0