On 09/06/2024 12:56, Javier Carrasco wrote:
> The conversion of this file to use the agnostic GPIO API has introduced
> a new early return where the refcounts of two device nodes (parent and
> child) are not decremented.
>
> Given that the device nodes are not required outside the loops where
> they are used, and to avoid potential bugs every time a new error path
> is introduced to the loop, the _scoped() versions of the macros have
> been applied. The bug was introduced recently, and the fix is not
> relevant for old stable kernels that might not support the scoped()
> variant.
>
> Fixes: 1d38f9d89f85 ("PCI: kirin: Convert to use agnostic GPIO API")
> Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> This bug was found while analyzing the code and I don't have hardware to
> validate it beyond compilation and static analysis. Any test with real
> hardware to make sure there are no regressions is always welcome.
>
> The dev_err() messages have not been converted into dev_err_probe() to
> keep the current format, but I am open to convert them if preferred.
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-kirin.c | 21 ++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-kirin.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-kirin.c
> index d1f54f188e71..0a29136491b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-kirin.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-kirin.c
> @@ -403,11 +403,10 @@ static int kirin_pcie_parse_port(struct kirin_pcie *pcie,
> struct device_node *node)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> - struct device_node *parent, *child;
> int ret, slot, i;
>
> - for_each_available_child_of_node(node, parent) {
> - for_each_available_child_of_node(parent, child) {
> + for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped(node, parent) {
> + for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped(parent, child) {
> i = pcie->num_slots;
>
> pcie->id_reset_gpio[i] = devm_fwnode_gpiod_get_index(dev,
> @@ -424,14 +423,13 @@ static int kirin_pcie_parse_port(struct kirin_pcie *pcie,
> pcie->num_slots++;
> if (pcie->num_slots > MAX_PCI_SLOTS) {
> dev_err(dev, "Too many PCI slots!\n");
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto put_node;
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> ret = of_pci_get_devfn(child);
> if (ret < 0) {
> dev_err(dev, "failed to parse devfn: %d\n", ret);
> - goto put_node;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> slot = PCI_SLOT(ret);
> @@ -439,10 +437,8 @@ static int kirin_pcie_parse_port(struct kirin_pcie *pcie,
> pcie->reset_names[i] = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL,
> "pcie_perst_%d",
> slot);
> - if (!pcie->reset_names[i]) {
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> - goto put_node;
> - }
> + if (!pcie->reset_names[i])
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> gpiod_set_consumer_name(pcie->id_reset_gpio[i],
> pcie->reset_names[i]);
> @@ -450,11 +446,6 @@ static int kirin_pcie_parse_port(struct kirin_pcie *pcie,
> }
>
> return 0;
> -
> -put_node:
> - of_node_put(child);
> - of_node_put(parent);
> - return ret;
> }
>
> static long kirin_pcie_get_resource(struct kirin_pcie *kirin_pcie,
>
> ---
> base-commit: d35b2284e966c0bef3e2182a5c5ea02177dd32e4
> change-id: 20240609-pcie-kirin-memleak-18c83a31d111
>
> Best regards,
Hi, has this patch been applied anywhere? I couldn't find it in
linux-next and pci/next.
Best regards,
Javier Carrasco
