On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 16:21:45 +0800 Jian-Hong Pan <jhp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > According to "PCIe r6.0, sec 5.5.4", before enabling ASPM L1.2 on the > PCIe Root Port and the child device, they should be programmed with > the same LTR1.2_Threshold value. However, they have different values > on VMD mapped PCI child bus. For example, Asus B1400CEAE's VMD mapped > PCI bridge and NVMe SSD controller have different LTR1.2_Threshold > values: > > 10000:e0:06.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 11th Gen Core Processor > PCIe Controller (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) ... > Capabilities: [200 v1] L1 PM Substates > L1SubCap: PCI-PM_L1.2+ PCI-PM_L1.1+ ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1+ > L1_PM_Substates+ PortCommonModeRestoreTime=45us PortTPowerOnTime=50us > L1SubCtl1: PCI-PM_L1.2- PCI-PM_L1.1- ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1- > T_CommonMode=45us LTR1.2_Threshold=101376ns > L1SubCtl2: T_PwrOn=50us > > 10000:e1:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Sandisk Corp WD Blue > SN550 NVMe SSD (rev 01) (prog-if 02 [NVM Express]) ... > Capabilities: [900 v1] L1 PM Substates > L1SubCap: PCI-PM_L1.2+ PCI-PM_L1.1- ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1- > L1_PM_Substates+ PortCommonModeRestoreTime=32us PortTPowerOnTime=10us > L1SubCtl1: PCI-PM_L1.2- PCI-PM_L1.1- ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1- > T_CommonMode=0us LTR1.2_Threshold=0ns > L1SubCtl2: T_PwrOn=10us > > After debug in detail, both of the VMD mapped PCI bridge and the NVMe > SSD controller have been configured properly with the same > LTR1.2_Threshold value. But, become misconfigured after reset the VMD > mapped PCI bus which is introduced from commit 0a584655ef89 ("PCI: > vmd: Fix secondary bus reset for Intel bridges") and commit > 6aab5622296b ("PCI: vmd: Clean up domain before enumeration"). So, > drop the resetting PCI bus action after scan VMD mapped PCI child bus. > > Signed-off-by: Jian-Hong Pan <jhp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v6: > - Introduced based on the discussion > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/CAPpJ_efYWWxGBopbSQHB=Y2+1RrXFR2XWeqEhGTgdiw3XX0Jmw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c | 20 -------------------- > 1 file changed, 20 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c > b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c index 5309afbe31f9..af413cdb4f4e 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c > @@ -793,7 +793,6 @@ static int vmd_enable_domain(struct vmd_dev *vmd, > unsigned long features) resource_size_t offset[2] = {0}; > resource_size_t membar2_offset = 0x2000; > struct pci_bus *child; > - struct pci_dev *dev; > int ret; > > /* > @@ -935,25 +934,6 @@ static int vmd_enable_domain(struct vmd_dev > *vmd, unsigned long features) pci_scan_child_bus(vmd->bus); > vmd_domain_reset(vmd); > > - /* When Intel VMD is enabled, the OS does not discover the > Root Ports > - * owned by Intel VMD within the MMCFG space. > pci_reset_bus() applies > - * a reset to the parent of the PCI device supplied as > argument. This > - * is why we pass a child device, so the reset can be > triggered at > - * the Intel bridge level and propagated to all the children > in the > - * hierarchy. > - */ > - list_for_each_entry(child, &vmd->bus->children, node) { > - if (!list_empty(&child->devices)) { > - dev = list_first_entry(&child->devices, > - struct pci_dev, > bus_list); > - ret = pci_reset_bus(dev); > - if (ret) > - pci_warn(dev, "can't reset device: > %d\n", ret); - > - break; > - } > - } > - > pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(vmd->bus); > > pci_walk_bus(vmd->bus, vmd_pm_enable_quirk, &features); Thanks for the patch. pci_reset_bus is required to avoid failure in vmd domain creation during multiple soft reboots test. So I believe we can't just remove it without proper testing. vmd_pm_enable_quirk happens after pci_reset_bus, then how is it resetting LTR1.2_Threshold value? Thanks -nirmal