In commit 7e89efc6e9e4 ("PCI: Lock upstream bridge for pci_reset_function()") it was missed that pci_cfg_access_trylock() needs the same lockdep assertion as pci_cfg_access_lock(). This leads to false positive lockdep splats for users of pci_cfg_access_trylock(). Add the missing assertion when the lock was successfully acquired. Fixes: 7e89efc6e9e4 ("PCI: Lock upstream bridge for pci_reset_function()") Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/pci/access.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/pci/access.c b/drivers/pci/access.c index 30f031de9cfe..5b6620da30d7 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/access.c +++ b/drivers/pci/access.c @@ -319,6 +319,8 @@ bool pci_cfg_access_trylock(struct pci_dev *dev) dev->block_cfg_access = 1; raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_lock, flags); + if (locked) + lock_map_acquire(&dev->cfg_access_lock); return locked; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_cfg_access_trylock); --- base-commit: c3f38fa61af77b49866b006939479069cd451173 change-id: 20240604-pci_cfg_lockdep-b6914e62d726 Best regards, -- Niklas Schnelle