On 5/24/24 10:59, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 10:54:01AM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> +static int nwl_pcie_phy_enable(struct nwl_pcie *pcie)
>> +{
>> + int i, ret;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pcie->phy); i++) {
>> + ret = phy_init(pcie->phy[i]);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto err;
>> +
>> + ret = phy_power_on(pcie->phy[i]);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + WARN_ON(phy_exit(pcie->phy[i]));
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +err:
>> + while (--i) {
>
> This doesn't work. If we fail on the first iteration, then it will
> lead to an array underflow. It should be while (--i >= 0) or
> while (i--). I prefer the first, but the second format works for people
> who use unsigned iterators.
Thanks, will fix.
--Sean
>> + WARN_ON(phy_power_off(pcie->phy[i]));
>> + WARN_ON(phy_exit(pcie->phy[i]));
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
