On 5/23/24 16:11, Markus Elfring wrote:
>>> …
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c
>>> …
>>>> @@ -817,11 +818,23 @@ static int nwl_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>> err = nwl_pcie_enable_msi(pcie);
>>>> if (err < 0) {
>>>> dev_err(dev, "failed to enable MSI support: %d\n", err);
>>>> - return err;
>>>> + goto err_clk;
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> - return pci_host_probe(bridge);
>>>> + err = pci_host_probe(bridge);
>>>> +
>>>> +err_clk:
>>>> + if (err)
>>>> + clk_disable_unprepare(pcie->clk);
>>>
>>> I suggest to use the label “disable_unprepare_clock” directly before this function call
>>> (in the if branch) so that a duplicate check would be avoided after some error cases.
>>
>> Well if you want to avoid a check, we can just do
>>
>> err = pci_host_probe(bridge);
>> if (!err)
>> return 0;
>>
>> err_clk:
>> ...
>
> This design variant can also be reasonable.
>
> Do any preferences matter here for label name selections?
Personally, I prefer to use labels named after what they're cleaning up and not what they're doing.
--Sean
