Re: [PATCH v10 2/4] PCI/DOE: Rename Discovery Response Data Object Contents to type

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Wed, 22 May 2024 20:11:40 +1000
Alistair Francis <alistair23@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> PCIe r6.1 (which was published July 24) describes a "Vendor ID", a
> "Data Object Type" and "Next Index" as the fields in the DOE
> Discovery Response Data Object. The DOE driver currently uses
> both the terms type and prot for the second element.
> This patch renames all uses of the DOE Discovery Response Data Object
> to use type as the second element of the object header, instead of
> type/prot as it currently is.
> Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xxxxxxx>

Other than the below query on it being a potentially breaking change
for userspace code this looks fine to me.

> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
> index 94c00996e633..4fa1ec622177 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
> @@ -1146,7 +1146,7 @@
>  #define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_REQ_3_INDEX		0x000000ff
>  #define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_REQ_3_VER		0x0000ff00
>  #define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_RSP_3_VID		0x0000ffff
> -#define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_RSP_3_PROTOCOL		0x00ff0000
> +#define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_RSP_3_TYPE		0x00ff0000

Safe to change a userspace header?  I've no idea if any external project
is using this define but probably shouldn't make this change or should
leave a compatibility define in place.

>  /* Compute Express Link (CXL r3.1, sec 8.1.5) */

[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux