Re: [PATCH] PCI: tegra194: Add check for host and endpoint modes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 05:49:00PM +0200, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Tegra194 driver supports both the host and endpoint mode, but there are no
> checks to validate whether the corresponding mode is enabled in kernel
> config or not. So if the driver tries to function without enabling the
> required mode (CONFIG_PCIE_TEGRA194_HOST/CONFIG_PCIE_TEGRA194_EP), then it
> will result in driver malfunction.
> So let's add the checks in probe() before doing the mode specific config
> and fail probe() if the corresponding mode is not enabled.
> But this also requires adding one redundant check in
> pex_ep_event_pex_rst_assert() for pci_epc_deinit_notify(). Because the
> function is called outside of probe() and the compiler fails to spot the
> dependency in probe() and still complains about the undefined reference to
> pci_epc_deinit_notify().
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> Closes:
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
> index d2223821e122..e02a9bca70ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
> @@ -1715,7 +1715,16 @@ static void pex_ep_event_pex_rst_assert(struct tegra_pcie_dw *pcie)
>  	if (ret)
>  		dev_err(pcie->dev, "Failed to go Detect state: %d\n", ret);
> -	pci_epc_deinit_notify(pcie->pci.ep.epc);
> +	/*
> +	 * We do not really need the below guard as the driver won't probe
> +	 * successfully if it tries to probe in EP mode and
> +	 * CONFIG_PCIE_TEGRA194_EP is not enabled. But since this function is
> +	 * being called outside of probe(), compiler fails to spot the
> +	 * dependency in probe() and hence this redundant check.
> +	 */
> +		pci_epc_deinit_notify(pcie->pci.ep.epc);
> +

This big comment is a bit ugly. It would be nice if it could be avoided.

(pci-epc.h does not provide any dummy implementations for any of the
functions, so I suggest that we leave it like that.)

However, if we look at dw_pcie_ep_init_notify(), it is called from
pex_ep_event_pex_rst_deassert(), and we do not get a build warning for that.

The reason is that dw_pcie_ep_init_notify() has a dummy implementation
in pcie-designware.h.

May I suggest that we add a dw_pcie_ep_deinit_notify() wrapper around
pci_epc_deinit_notify(), while also providing a dummy implementation
in pcie-designware.h ?

That way, the code in pcie-tegra194.c (and pcie-qcom-ep.c) would be
more symmetrical, calling dw_pcie_ep_init_notify() for init notification,
and dw_pcie_ep_deinit_notify() for deinit notification.

(Instead of dw_pcie_ep_init_notify() + pci_epc_deinit_notify())

Kind regards,

[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux