> > If (!ide_cap && tee_cap), we get here but doing the below does not make
> > sense for TEE (which are likely to be VFs).
>
> The "!ide_cap && tee_cap" case may also be the "TSM wants to setup IDE
> without TDISP flow".
IIUC, should be "TSM wants to setup TDISP without IDE flow"?
But I think aik is talking about VFs (which fit "!ide_cap && tee_cap"),
VFs should not be rejected by the following:
pci_tsm->doe_mb = pci_find_doe_mailbox(pdev, PCI_VENDOR_ID_PCI_SIG,
PCI_DOE_PROTO_CMA);
if (!pci_tsm->doe_mb)
return;
VF should check its PF's doe/ide/tee cap and then be added to
pci_tsm_devs, is it?
Thanks,
Yilun
