On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 04:36:34PM +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > pcie_read_tlp_log() handles only 4 TLP Header Log DWORDs but TLP Prefix > Log (PCIe r6.1 secs 7.8.4.12 & 7.9.14.13) may also be present. > > Generalize pcie_read_tlp_log() and struct pcie_tlp_log to handle also > TLP Prefix Log. The layout of relevant registers in AER and DPC > Capability is not identical because the offsets of TLP Header Log and > TLP Prefix Log vary so the callers must pass the offsets to > pcie_read_tlp_log(). I think the layouts of the Header Log and the TLP Prefix Log *are* identical, but they are at different offsets in the AER Capability vs the DPC Capability. Lukas and I have both stumbled over this. Similar and more comments at: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240322193011.GA701027@bhelgaas > Convert eetlp_prefix_path into integer called eetlp_prefix_max and > make is available also when CONFIG_PCI_PASID is not configured to > be able to determine the number of E-E Prefixes. s/make is/make it/ I think this could be a separate patch. > --- a/include/linux/aer.h > +++ b/include/linux/aer.h > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ struct pci_dev; > > struct pcie_tlp_log { > u32 dw[4]; > + u32 prefix[4]; > }; > > struct aer_capability_regs { > @@ -37,7 +38,9 @@ struct aer_capability_regs { > u16 uncor_err_source; > }; > > -int pcie_read_tlp_log(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, struct pcie_tlp_log *log); > +int pcie_read_tlp_log(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, int where2, > + unsigned int tlp_len, struct pcie_tlp_log *log); > +unsigned int aer_tlp_log_len(struct pci_dev *dev); I think it was a mistake to expose pcie_read_tlp_log() outside drivers/pci, and I don't think we should expose aer_tlp_log_len() either. We might be stuck with exposing struct pcie_tlp_log since it looks like ras_event.h uses it. Bjorn