Some hotplug drivers do not check the returned value of pci_hp_add_bridge(). This may be probmatic if the driver proceed while pci_hp_add_bridge() fails. Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/pci/hotplug/TODO | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/TODO b/drivers/pci/hotplug/TODO index fdb8dd6ea24d..f0a1746c3c88 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/TODO +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/TODO @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ cpcihp: ->set_power callbacks in struct cpci_hp_controller_ops. Why were they introduced? Can they be removed from the struct? +* Returned code from pci_hp_add_bridge() is not checked. + cpqphp: * The driver spawns a kthread cpqhp_event_thread() which is woken by the @@ -16,6 +18,8 @@ cpqphp: * A large portion of cpqphp_ctrl.c and cpqphp_pci.c concerns resource management. Doesn't this duplicate functionality in the core? +* Returned code from pci_hp_add_bridge() is not checked. + ibmphp: * Implementations of hotplug_slot_ops callbacks such as get_adapter_present() @@ -43,6 +47,8 @@ ibmphp: * A large portion of ibmphp_res.c and ibmphp_pci.c concerns resource management. Doesn't this duplicate functionality in the core? +* Returned code from pci_hp_add_bridge() is not checked. + sgi_hotplug: * Several functions access the pci_slot member in struct hotplug_slot even -- 2.39.2
