Re: [PATCH v4 RESEND 5/8] PCI: qcom: Add support for IPQ9574

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On 01/05/2024 17:43, wrote:
> On 5/1/24 5:21 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 01/05/2024 06:28, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
>>> IPQ9574 has four PCIe controllers: two single-lane Gen3, and two
>>> dual-lane Gen3. The controllers are identical from a software
>>> perspective, with the differences appearing in the PHYs.
>>> Add a compatible for the PCIe on IPQ9574.
>> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
>> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
>> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
>> versions, under or above your Signed-off-by tag. Tag is "received", when
>> provided in a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4
>> can help here. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add
>> the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the
>> version they apply.
>> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> I had an Acked-by tag from Rob for what is now patch 6/8 -- previously 
> 5/7. Due to last-minute info from QUIC Inc, Dmitry and I decided to move 
> the "snoc" and "anoc" clocks out of the PHY and to the PCIe controller.
> This change resulted in a 6/8 patch that is substantially different from 
> what Rob acked. I felt it was inappropriate to keep the tag.

So please read my message again:
"If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed."

Your changelog for that patch should say that.

Best regards,

[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux