Dave Jiang wrote: > > > On 5/1/24 8:37 AM, PJ Waskiewicz wrote: > > On Mon, 2024-04-29 at 15:35 -0700, Dave Jiang wrote: > >> Move PCI_DVSEC_VENDOR_ID_CXL in CXL private code to PCI_VENDOR_ID_CXL > >> in > >> pci_ids.h in order to be utilized in PCI subsystem. > >> > >> When uplevelling PCI_DVSEC_VENDOR_ID_CXL to a common locatoin Bjorn > >> suggested making it a proper PCI_VENDOR_ID_* define in > >> include/linux/pci_ids.h. While it is not in the PCI IDs database it > >> is a > >> reserved value and Linux treats it as a 'vendor id' for all intents > >> and > >> purposes [1]. > > > > Would you consider a patch, after this series merges, to upstream > > pciutils to sync up lspci's name of this value as well? It would be > > less confusing to anyone looking at both codebases and trying to line > > up #define's. > > > > Yes I can look into doing that. Wait, isn't this Martin's call? If pcituils follows the kernel, great, if it does not, that's pciutil's prerogative.
