Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] i2c: omap: wakeup the controller during suspend() callback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 11:40:02AM +0200, Thomas Richard wrote:
> On 4/19/24 10:47, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > Hi Thomas,
> > 
> >> +static int omap_i2c_suspend(struct device *dev)
> >> +{
> >> +	/*
> >> +	 * If the controller is autosuspended, there is no way to wakeup it once
> >> +	 * runtime pm is disabled (in suspend_late()).
> >> +	 * But a device may need the controller up during suspend_noirq() or
> >> +	 * resume_noirq().
> >> +	 * Wakeup the controller while runtime pm is enabled, so it is available
> >> +	 * until its suspend_noirq(), and from resume_noirq().
> >> +	 */
> >> +	return pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static int omap_i2c_resume(struct device *dev)
> >> +{
> >> +	pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev);
> >> +	pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev);
> >> +
> >> +	return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>  static const struct dev_pm_ops omap_i2c_pm_ops = {
> >>  	SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(pm_runtime_force_suspend,
> >>  				      pm_runtime_force_resume)
> >> +	SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(omap_i2c_suspend, omap_i2c_resume)
> > 
> > If you don't have CONFIG_PM_SLEEP, though, this doesn't compile.
> 
> Hello Andi,
> 
> Yes indeed, the __maybe_unused attribute is missing for
> omap_i2c_suspend() and omap_i2c_resume().

Isn't there a way to avoid having to use the __maybe_unused attribute?

E.g., use DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() as is done by these:

  82f9cefadac4 ("serial: 8250_exar: switch to DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS()")
  f243df0a0be0 ("media: platform: rzg2l-cru: rzg2l-csi2: Switch to RUNTIME_PM_OPS()")
  6ccc22a5afcb ("net: ravb: Switch to SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS()/RUNTIME_PM_OPS() and pm_ptr()")

Bjorn




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux