On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 11:12:09AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 05:28:31PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > > BME which stands for 'Bus Master Enable' is not defined in the PCIe base > > spec even though it is commonly referred in many places (vendor docs). But > > to align with the spec, let's rename it to its expansion 'Bus Master > > Enable'. > > Thanks for doing this. I'm always in favor of using terms from the > spec. > > > - dev_dbg(dev, "Received BME event. Link is enabled!\n"); > > + dev_dbg(dev, "Received Bus Master Enable event. Link is enabled!\n"); > > Nothing to do with *this* patch, but this message reads a little weird > to me because setting Bus Master Enable has nothing to do with link > enablement. > That's my bad. I'll remove it. > Also incidental: some of these messages and comments refer to a "Bus > Master Enable *event*". Does "event" here refer to the act of the > host setting the Bus Master Enable bit in the Command register? This > is in qcom_pcie_ep_global_irq_thread(), so I assume there's something > in the endpoint hardware that generates an IRQ when the Command > register is written? > Yes, the PCIe endpoint controller generates an IRQ when host sets Bus Master Enable bit. > > - * pci_epc_bme_notify() - Notify the EPF device that the EPC device has received > > - * the BME event from the Root complex > > - * @epc: the EPC device that received the BME event > > + * pci_epc_bus_master_enable_notify() - Notify the EPF device that the EPC > > + * device has received the Bus Master > > + * Enable event from the Root complex > > + * @epc: the EPC device that received the Bus Master Enable event > > * > > * Invoke to Notify the EPF device that the EPC device has received the Bus > > - * Master Enable (BME) event from the Root complex > > + * Master Enable event from the Root complex > > There's no "set Bus Master Enable" transaction that would appear on > the PCIe link, so I assume "the Bus Master Enable event from the Root > Complex" is a way of saying something like "host has written the > Command register to set the Bus Master Enable bit"? > Yes. But looking at it again, it could be reworded as below: 'Invoke to notify the EPF device that the EPC device has generated the Bus Master Enable event due to host setting the Bus Master Enable bit in the Command register.' - Mani -- மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்