On 16/04/2024 16:32, matthew.gerlach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> >> Why Hip is the first? Old binding suggested it to be the last entry. It >> would also make binding easier, as you describe reg and reg-names in >> top-level and just limit them with min/maxItems. >> >> Does anything depend on different order (Hip as first)? > > I don't think the order really matters. So Hip could go last, and it makes The order matters, it is the ABI. Best regards, Krzysztof
