Re: [net-next PATCH 00/15] eth: fbnic: Add network driver for Meta Platforms Host Network Interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/8/24 14:49, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 4/8/24 13:43, Alexander Duyck wrote:

Also as far as item 3 isn't hard for it to be a "user-visible"
regression if there are no users outside of the vendor that is
maintaining the driver to report it?

This wasn't the case. It was change in core code, which broke specific
version of vagrant. Vendor caught it simply by luck.

Any more info on this? Without context it is hard to say one way or the other.

Believe this is the thread in question:

https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/MN2PR12MB44863139E562A59329E89DBEB982A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

And the follow up:

https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/14459261ea9f9c7d7dfb28eb004ce8734fa83ade.1704185904.git.leonro@xxxxxxxxxx/
--
Florian





[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux