On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 07:16:05PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 12:52:10PM +0200, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 09:20:29PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > core_init() callback is used to notify the EPC initialization event to the
> > > EPF drivers. The 'core' prefix was used indicate that the controller IP
> > > core has completed initialization. But it serves no purpose as the EPF
> > > driver will only care about the EPC initialization as a whole and there is
> > > no real benefit to distinguish the IP core part.
> > >
> > > So let's rename the core_init() callback in 'struct pci_epc_event_ops' to
> > > just init() to make it more clear.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c | 4 ++--
> > > drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 4 ++--
> > > drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> > > include/linux/pci-epf.h | 4 ++--
> > > 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c
> > > index 280863c0eeb9..b3c26ffd29a5 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c
> > > @@ -716,7 +716,7 @@ static void pci_epf_mhi_dma_deinit(struct pci_epf_mhi *epf_mhi)
> > > epf_mhi->dma_chan_rx = NULL;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static int pci_epf_mhi_core_init(struct pci_epf *epf)
> > > +static int pci_epf_mhi_epc_init(struct pci_epf *epf)
> > > {
> > > struct pci_epf_mhi *epf_mhi = epf_get_drvdata(epf);
> > > const struct pci_epf_mhi_ep_info *info = epf_mhi->info;
> > > @@ -897,7 +897,7 @@ static void pci_epf_mhi_unbind(struct pci_epf *epf)
> > > }
> > >
> > > static const struct pci_epc_event_ops pci_epf_mhi_epc_event_ops = {
> > > - .core_init = pci_epf_mhi_core_init,
> > > + .init = pci_epf_mhi_epc_init,
> > > };
> > >
> > > static const struct pci_epc_bus_event_ops pci_epf_mhi_bus_event_ops = {
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> > > index 973db0b1bde2..abcb6ca61c4e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> > > @@ -731,7 +731,7 @@ static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf)
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static int pci_epf_test_core_init(struct pci_epf *epf)
> > > +static int pci_epf_test_epc_init(struct pci_epf *epf)
> >
> > On V1 you agreed that it is better to remove 'epc' from the naming.
> > (For both pci-epf-test and pci-epf-mhi).
> > You seem to have forgotten to address this for V2.
> >
>
> Oh yeah, sorry about that. I tried to address comments for both series and
> apparently this one got missed.
>
Ok, now I remember that I kept the prefix intentionally. The module init
functions are already named as pci_epf_{test/mhi}_init(), so cannot use the same
name for the callback also. And using some other name didn't fit, so I kept
'epc' as the prefix since the callback acts on the EPC initialization event
anyway.
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
