Bjorn Helgaas wrote: [..] > FWIW, I pinged administration@xxxxxxxxxx and got the response that > "1E98h is not a VID in our system, but 1E98 has already been reserved > by CXL." > > I wish there were a clearer public statement of this reservation, but > I interpret the response to mean that CXL is not a "Vendor", maybe due > to some strict definition of "Vendor," but that PCI-SIG will not > assign 0x1e98 to any other vendor. > > So IMO we should add "#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_CXL 0x1e98" so that if we > ever *do* see such an assignment, we'll be more likely to flag it as > an issue. Agree.
